
Cancel culture has seeped into my personal life. An old friend forgets my birthday? Cancelled. A former classmate posts an annoying Instagram caption? Cancelled. My neighbour gives me a judgmental look? Cancelled. Itās a fabulous time to be someone who likes to hold grudges and has exceedingly high standards for people. Iāve cancelled so many friends that I can now count my inner circle on one hand, my logic being that Iād rather be alone than be surrounded by people who donāt enrich my life.
As a kid, my silent treatments would last for days, now I can hold them for weeks, months, even years. This week, I broke a silence that had formed after months of conflict with a close friend. Two months ago, I was ready to cancel a lifelong relationshipāmy hurt boiled, erupted, and then cooled and hardened into apathy. I figured I should walk away rather than attempt to change the person or face my own pain.
Itās easy to be the one doing the cancelling, but what happens when youāre on the receiving end? A couple weeks ago, a reader called me out on Instagram, they described my use of a Black hand emoji in my profile bio as digital blackface. I apologized and we had a productive conversation that ended well. I knew my intentions had been good but in the week after I couldnāt shake the feeling that my bad action made me a bad person. I spiralled down a tunnel of shame and quickly yearned for absolution, to be freed from my guilt.
But is forgiveness even possible in our current quick-to-cancel climate? According to professor Jeffrie Murphy, as reported in The New York Times, forgiveness is āa change of heart toward someoneāovercoming the feelings of anger and resentment that typically come from being wronged by another.ā But when someone gets cancelled, they donāt seek forgiveness because they value their ārelationshipā with the person doing the calling out (fans, listeners, followers), they crave forgiveness because they want to salvage their reputation. Herein lies the danger of both cancelling and being cancelled, instead of focusing on transformation, we get too caught up in determining whether the person is good or bad.

Art: Eloise Magoncelli
In a helpful two-episode special of Unlocking Us with Brene Brown, apology expert Dr. Harriet Lerner says an apology is a gift the apologizer gives, not just to the victim, but to themselves. āAlthough we may feel vulnerable and small in apologizing, itās the opposite, I will be more respected with a good apology,ā she describes. Similarly, forgiveness seems more a gift to the apologizer than the victim. In both cases, transformation is potentially stifled by the more pressing desire for forgiveness; for the reassurance that the wrongdoer isnāt a bad person.
Itās like when youāre a kid and you sense youāre in trouble so you blurt out āIām sorry!ā before you even know what youāve done wrong. For grown-ups, it can look like empty corporate statements that commit to improving staff diversity after accusations of racism in the workplace. Apologizing and seeking forgiveness have become shortcuts to get back to ābusiness as usual,ā because itās too uncomfortable to face the reality that weāre capable of hurting others.
Implicit in an apology is the awareness that the apologizer made a mistake, that we all have flaws. But so often I think we accept our wrongdoing as an out-of-character blunder and move on, without sitting in the discomfort of guilt and letting it change us. āWe want forgiveness but a true apology doesnāt ask for anything back,ā says Dr. Lerner. āIf I apologize to you and then I too quickly, ādo you forgive meā, Iām cutting the process short to sit with it, to see if you have leftover pain.ā I need to slow down, allow time for digestion, reflect on past behaviour, and most importantly, envision a path forward.
Cancelling someone can feel like youāre asserting your self-worthāyou refuse to tolerate being treated poorly by that person ever again. But perhaps the more daring route to cultivating self-worth is to return to the wounded relationship but this time, boldly asserting how you deserve to be treated. We canāt change people, but we can reimagine our relationships. In the case of making a mistake, rather than simply apologizing, perhaps the more courageous path to reconciliation is to let go of the desire for forgiveness and put into practice what youāve learned.
A friend of mine recently let someone back into their life who I donāt think they should ever forgive, but this time theyāre going in with boundaries. My friend still loves this person but now has different expectations. They donāt have to absolve their friend of any guilt by offering forgiveness and they can grieve the relationship they once had, all while moving forward with a new one. The penalty for the wrongdoer, in this case, is that they wonāt have the same closeness with their friend; they lost a part of their relationship when they lost their friendās trust.

āAn apology isnāt an end to the conversation,ā says Dr. Lerner. āAn apology is what de-intensifies the situation so that two people can move forward and have room for further conversations.ā Even when the dialogue is between two strangers, as in the case of my being called out on Instagram, making āroom for further conversationsā is key. Rather than reduce the public apology to a weeklong trajectory that concludes with either cancellation or forgiveness, both sides need to sit with the uncomfortable feelings that come with being hurt or hurting someone else. A quick apology, a pressured āI forgive you,ā or simply cancelling altogether is a missed opportunity to recognize the multi-dimensional nature of human beings.
I donāt want to keep telling myself, āIām not a bad person because I did a bad thing,ā whenever I feel guilty. It only reinforces the notion that weāre all intrinsically āgoodā and worthy of forgiveness. What if we flipped the narrative: āweāre all bad people who do good and bad things?ā Would the apology become more than just a fast track to resolution? Would a default-as-flawed rather than default-as-perfection mindset allow more room for learning from mistakes? Maybe if we let go of the desire for clear cut, right-or-wrong answers, comfortable conversations, and perfect relationships, we will be less inclined to walk away when we get hurt or hurt someone else.
Best,
Anna
P.S. Read Lernerās 9 Rules for True Apologies if you want to prevent your next conflict from escalating.
Reading š
I finally finished Minor Feelings: An Asian American Reckoning by Cathy Park Hong. Iāve been nursing it since January because itās been both a crash course in identity politics and therapy. Itās essential reading for anyone with Asian ancestry, but feels relevant to everyone this yearāall the essays are, in their own unique way, an examination of racial consciousness in the United States.

I dog-eared so many pages that at a certain point, I had to give up on jotting down all the quotes I relate to, but hereās a sample:
āRacial self-hatred is seeing yourself the way the whites see you, which turns you into your own worst enemy. Your only defence is to be hard on yourself, which becomes compulsive, and therefore a comfort, to peck yourself to death. You donāt like how you look, how you sound. You think your Asian features are undefined, like God started pinching out your features and then abandoned you. You hate that there are so many Asians in the room. Who let in all the Asians? You rant in your head. Instead of solidarity, you feel that you are less than around other Asians, the boundaries of yourself no longer distinct but congealed into a horde.ā
Articles:
šš»āāļøYes, the Emily Ratajkowski sexual assault story lives up to the hype. The question of ownership and control interests me as a photographer, but even more so as a woman, āWhat does true empowerment even feel like? Is it feeling wanted? Is it commanding someoneās attention?ā
āļø The RBG fandom shouldnāt be taken lightly. āThe personal is political; the memes, like the person they celebrate, insisted that the personal is also judicial,ā writes Megan Garber. What will we do without Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
š§¹ Housekeepers out of work because of COVID-19 are facing a āfull-blown humanitarian crisis,ā but their precarious position is not new, it has racist roots.
š Is lab-grown meat really more virtuous than factory farming if it relies on the same monoculture farming that exploits workers and the environment? Is DIY cellular agriculture, like Shojinmeat in Japan, a scalable solution or will it just get Uber-ised?
š Concerns over how COVID-19 is impacting childrenās education must not forget those with special needs.
šø The work of photographer Heji Shin questions the responsibility of the artist in challenging systems of power.
š©āšØ Or does anyone who makes anything creative online these days just consider themselves god? (I feel embarrassingly seen).
Watching šŗ
In an ideal life Iād be south of the border, watching the second season of PEN15, released this week on Hulu, snacking on all the new pumpkin and maple products from Trader Joeās. But I guess Iāll settle for free health care⦠and the virtual Emmys.

Image: Hulu
Without the red carpet, the celebrity reaction shots, or the energy of the audience, the award show wonāt be the sameā¦but Iām still excited to cheer on my favourites. (I know, my obsession with movie and television award shows makes me a hypocrite given last weekās critique of ābestā lists).
The playing field would be more even without Watchmen (a record-breaking 26 nominations) and Succession (18 nominations), but both series were so brilliant I donāt mind if tonightās winner announcements start to sound repetitive. My predictions:
Watchmen will sweep the limited series categories (best series, lead actress, supporting actor, supporting actress, etc.).
Succession will own the drama categories except maybe supporting actress because they love Laura Dern (Big Little Lies) and Helena Bonham Carter (The Crown).
As for comedy? The predictable Emmy choice would be The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, but Iāll be annoyed if they win (although I did enjoy the latest season more than most ). Insecure deserves the win but Schittās Creek might take it.
Image: Emmys
It was such a great year of television, it will pain me to see award-worthy performances (ummm hi, Cate Blanchett) and taboo-challenging stories go unnoticed: Mrs. America, Ramy, Dead to Me, Unbelievable, Pose, Euphoria, Unorthodox, Little Fires Everywhere, and Hollywood, were my favorites.
What were yours? Are Ozark and The Crown worth watching?
Listening š§

Image: Time To Say Goodbye
Time To Say Goodbye is one of my go-to pods lately. In this episode they talk about racial passing, the intersection of race, class, and health in the COVID-19 context, and representation in pop culture. A highlight was learning how the media scapegoats other countries when American companies get called out for their exploitative practices (in the case of Mulan, Disney plays dumb and the focus shifts to looking down on Chinaās genocidal practices).
Best, is free! If you like what you read, please share. Thoughts or feedback? Email me!
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.